|
VALUATION: The High Price of Potential
By George Donnelly
CFO Magazine
Date Posted: 9/1999
Those insane internet-company
valuations have created quite a buzz on Wall Street of late. Although
they've come down closer to Earth recently, it remains hard to divine
rational explanations. Now a study of the Internet industry has
found at least a little rhyme, if not reason, to the values--and
also hints at their ultimate direction.
After dividing the Internet world into four broad
categories, "CyberValuation," a study by Bond &
Pecaro, a Washington, D.C.-based media consulting firm, found some
patterns behind the hysteria. The study analyzed 595 recent transactions
within the industry, and found Internet service providers (ISPs)
generally were valued at 5 to 7 times trailing revenue. Business-to-business
ventures averaged in the 12 to 13 times trailing-revenue range.
The highest valuations went to the portal (29 to 37 times trailing
revenue) and Internet retailers (33-37 times trailing revenue).
Why such a wide gap between the various players in
the electronic new world? Maturity and potential, explains Jeff
Anderson, a principal at Bond & Pecaro who authored the study.
He notes that the ISP industry is relatively mature, while the potential
of the Yahoos and Amazon.coms of the world are anyone's guess at
this point. Anderson sees parallels between the high Internet multiples
we're now seeing and the early days of the cellular-phone and cable
industries, before those sectors matured and market interest mellowed.
Of course, there are wide discrepancies even within
Internet subgroups. When @home bought Excite recently, the company
paid $6.7 billion, about 44 times trailing revenue. Yahoo's purchase
of Broadcast.com cost the portal $5.7 billion, or 255 times trailing
revenue. Both targets were portals, says Anderson, but Yahoo paid
a premium for the potential of Broadcast.com, which is the leading
aggregator of streaming media.
Anderson sees multiples rising as the industry expands.
Then, after consolidation occurs, revenue growth rates will decline,
as will valuation multiples, and "more traditional measures
of value will have to apply."
|